Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 3, 549,
March 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Cochrane Reviews |
Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices: a Cochrane review
1 Family Health International, P.O. Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA, 2 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands and 3 University of Rochester Medical Center, Box 668, Department of Obstretrics and Gynecology, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642-8668, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD) immediately after delivery is appealing for several reasons. The woman is known not to be pregnant, her motivation for contraception may be high and the setting may be convenient for both the woman and her provider. However, the risk of spontaneous expulsion may be unacceptably high. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of IUD insertion immediately after expulsion of the placenta. Our a priori hypothesis was that this practice is safe, but associated with higher expulsion rates than interval IUD insertion. METHODS: We used Medline, Popline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register computer searches, supplemented by review articles and contact with investigators. We sought all randomized controlled trials that had at least one treatment arm that involved immediate post-partum (within 10 min of placental expulsion) insertion of an IUD. Comparisons could include different IUDs, different insertion techniques, immediate versus delayed post-partum insertion, or immediate versus interval insertion (unrelated to pregnancy). Studies could include either vaginal or Caesarean deliveries. We evaluated the methodological quality of each report and sought to identify duplicate reporting of data from multicentre trials. We abstracted data onto data collection forms. Principal outcome measures included pregnancy, expulsion and continuation rates. Because the trials did not have uniform interventions, we were unable to aggregate them in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: We found no randomized controlled trials that directly compared immediate post-partum insertion with either delayed post-partum or interval insertion. Modifications of existing devices, such as adding absorbable sutures or additional appendages, did not appear beneficial. Most studies showed no important differences between insertions done by hand or by instruments. Lippes Loops and Progestasert devices did not perform as well as copper devices. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate post-partum insertion of IUDs appeared safe and effective, though direct comparisons with other insertion times were lacking. Advantages of immediate post-partum insertion include high motivation, assurance that the woman is not pregnant, and convenience. However, expulsion rates appear to be higher than with interval insertion. The popularity of immediate post-partum IUD insertion in countries as diverse as China, Mexico and Egypt support the feasibility of this approach. Early follow-up may be important in identifying spontaneous IUD expulsions.
Notes
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dgrimes{at}fhi.org
This paper is based on a Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library, issue 1, 2002 (see www.CochraneLibrary.net for information) with permission from The Cochrane Collaboration and Update Software. Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.