Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Barri, P.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Barri, P.N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 5, 871-874, May 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: immediate withdrawal of the catheter versus a 30 second wait

F. Martínez1,, B. Coroleu, M. Parriego, O. Carreras, I. Belil, N. Parera, L. Hereter, R. Buxaderas and P.N. Barri

Servicio de Medicina de la Reproducción, Instituto Universitario Dexeus, Pso Bonanova 67, 08017 Barcelona, Spain

It is essential to deposit embryos as gently as possible during IVF, avoiding manoeuvres that might trigger uterine contractions which could adversely affect the results of this treatment. The time during which the embryo transfer catheter remains in the cervical canal might be related to stimulation of contractions. This study investigates the influence that the time interval before withdrawal of the catheter after ultrasound (US)-guided embryo deposit might have on the pregnancy rate in patients under IVF cycles. A total of 100 women about to undergo transfer of at least two optimal embryos was studied. The women were prospectively randomized into two groups: (i) slow withdrawal of the catheter immediately after embryo deposit (n = 51); and (ii) a 30 s delay before catheter withdrawal (n = 49). The pregnancy rates for transfer in the two groups were 60.8 and 69.4% respectively, with no significant differences. There were no statistically significant differences in pregnancy rates between the two patient groups. The results indicate either that the waiting interval was insufficient to detect differences, or that the retention time before withdrawing the catheter is not a factor that influences pregnancy rate.

Key words: embryo transfer/IVF/ultrasound-guided/uterine contractions/waiting time

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: pacmar{at}iudexeus.uab.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
I.P. Kosmas, R. Janssens, L. De Munck, H. Al Turki, J. Van der Elst, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey
Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1327 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
R.T. Mansour and M.A. Aboulghar
Optimizing the embryo transfer technique
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1149 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.