Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snowdon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Green, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snowdon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Green, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 12, 341-350, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Preimplantation diagnosis and other reproductive options: attitudes of male and female carriers of recessive disorders

C Snowdon and JM Green
Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, UK.

This questionnaire-based study describes in detail the attitudes of 245 carriers of recessive disorders to preimplantation diagnosis (PID). These are compared to responses to other reproductive options for carriers, that is prenatal diagnosis (PND), adoption, donor insemination (DI) and egg donation. The positive attitudes of this sample to PID and corresponding negative attitudes to adoption, DI and egg donation are striking. Almost the entire sample indicated that they viewed early reassurance and the opportunity to avoid a termination of pregnancy as important advantages of PID. Disadvantageous aspects of PID were acknowledged, but did not result in many participants finding this approach unacceptable. The study revealed a number of differences between men and women, especially in their perceptions of the disadvantages of PID. Women saw the practical difficulties of PID as more important disadvantages than did the men, and were very much more concerned about the issues involving embryos. Men, conversely, rated the impact upon their partners as a more important disadvantage. These findings underline the importance of considering both sets of views. Despite support for PID, in an overall assessment it did not displace PND as the most useful reproductive option.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
U. Menon, J. Harper, A. Sharma, L. Fraser, M. Burnell, K. ElMasry, C. Rodeck, and I. Jacobs
Views of BRCA gene mutation carriers on preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a reproductive option for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1573 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
I. Gotz and M. Gotz
How and Why Parents Change Their Attitudes to Prenatal Diagnosis
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, April 1, 2006; 11(2): 293 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
S. K. Peterson
The Role of the Family in Genetic Testing: Theoretical Perspectives, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 627 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S.A. Lavery, R. Aurell, C. Turner, C. Castello, A. Veiga, P.N. Barri, and R.M. Winston
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients' experiences and attitudes
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2464 - 2467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.